Sponsored by
Catholic Knights
Milwaukee Catholic Herald Subscribe to the Milwaukee Catholic Herald
Food for the Poor
Information about Milwaukee Catholic Herald Links Related to the Catholic Herald Catholic Herald Classifieds Catholic School/Parish Sports Listings Catholic School/Parish Sports Listings Catholic Herald Advertising
Milwaukee Catholic Herald Home Page
Herald of hope
National and World Catholic News Links
Past Catholic Herald Issues
Photos of the Week
Submit Information
St. Ann Center
Rosalie Manor
Capri Communities
Aug. 12, 2004
Parish liturgist offers guidelines
for Catholic weddings

Wedding music should not detract
from sacred aspect of ceremony

By Jill Maria Murdy
Special to the Catholic Herald
Now that we are into summer, it is wedding season. There are the two basic types of wedding celebrations that may take place within the church. Basically, it amounts to a Catholic marriage with or without a Mass. A wedding without Mass includes the procession, the opening prayer, the Scripture readings, the homily, the couple’s exchange of consent, the rings, and the blessings. It does not include the preparation of the bread and wine, the eucharistic prayer, and the communion rite.

Celebrating a wedding Mass is a beautiful option when both the bride and groom are Catholics. In that sense it is preferred, because the Eucharist is the ultimate sacrament of unity between a couple, and among the people of God. When the bride and groom come from different faith backgrounds, or when we know that most attending the service will not be Catholics, then the simpler service may be a better fit. It is still reverent, and beautiful, and includes the Scriptures and vows. There are simply times when one service will fit better than the other.

Many couples consider their options and discern this wisely. What I find sad is when I hear statements like, “Oh, we are not having the Mass because it cuts into picture time” or, “We don’t want that whole Mass because it is too long.” Or the couple who balks at getting a cantor to help lead the community gathered in prayer, but thinks nothing of a couple of stretch limos. In those instances I bite my tongue, as I wonder about the order of priority people are placing on their weddings.

Another interesting tidbit is the unity candle. Do you know this is not in the actual Catholic rite? Rather, it is sort of a grassroots thing that has taken hold and become as important as the vows themselves to some people. Works well for the people at Hallmark though.

One of the other questions I’ve been asked is “How come we can’t have our wedding in the park?” It would be very tempting to simply use the age old reply, “Because the church doesn’t,” but that doesn’t resolve anything. To summarize it briefly, Canon Law (1118) suggests that whenever a Catholic marries another Catholic or any other baptized Christian, the ceremony should take place in the parish church or another church or chapel. Under certain special conditions, the bishop may grant permission to celebrate in other places.

Actually this is the same rule of thumb that is used for any Mass. We celebrate in the church because this is where the people of God gather together. Outdoor Masses generally take place for very specific occasions when the assembly gathered would be too large to hold in any one facility. (For example, a papal Mass.)

Another frequently asked question is around the topic of wedding music; more specifically, “How do you determine if a song is appropriate or not?” As a liturgist, it is my job to help the couple with this question and discern whether their selections pass “the three judgments” set up by the National Conference of Catholic Bishops’ Commission on the Liturgy.

The music should be good quality and technically correct, avoiding trite musical clichés.

Since the music is part of the sacred liturgy, it should add to it, not detract from the sacred aspect of the ceremony. So it should be readily identifiable as prayer, and appropriate for the place in the liturgy.

Finally, probably the most dicey of the three judgments: “How well does this particular piece of music help this group assembled pray today?” This is where healthy dialogue between the wedding couple and myself come into play. You may listen to a song and wonder “How did that get into a wedding?” While I listened to the bride tell me what it meant to her spiritually, or how the groom heard it as prayer.

So in the end, these are some of the questions we would explore related to music:

• Will the music allow the couple and assembly to worship God?

• Does it express faith of the couple and the church, praise God, tell of God’s love, or ask for God’s blessings?

• Can the sentiments expressed be shared by the assembly as a whole? Is it sufficiently beautiful?

I hope I don’t sound like a liturgical ogre. But then, I am reminded that if there weren’t liturgical abuses, there would be no need for liturgical guidelines.

(Murdy is director of liturgy and music at St. Frances Cabrini Parish in West Bend. This article was adapted from a column written for the St. Frances Cabrini parish bulletin.)
Back to the top