 |
Bishop Richard
J. Sklba |
 |
Herald
of Hope is a weekly column started by
former Milwaukee Archbishop Rembert G. Weakland
in the Catholic Herald and written by
the bishops of the Milwaukee Archdiocese. |
|
The three purposes of the Second Vatican
Council were the renewal of the church, the reconciliation
of the churches and the transformation of the world
by the Gospel of Jesus Christ.
The bishops of the Council, inspired by the leadership
of Blessed John XXIII, were convinced that restating
the fundamental purpose and mission of the church would
allow the Holy Spirit to purify and renew us as Catholics,
and bring new vitality to the ecumenical quest for the
unity of faith clearly desired by God. If unified into
a single voice and witness, we could bring a more effective
voice to the world within which we live.
As a result of that logic, and empowered by the results
already experienced during the four years of the Council’s
deliberations, the bishops proclaimed on Dec. 7, 1965,
a final stirring “Pastoral Constitution on the
Church in the Modern World” (Gaudium et spes).
The last section of that historic document lists five
problems of special urgency: 1) fostering the nobility
of marriage and the family, 2) the proper development
of culture, 3) socio-economic life, 4) the life of the
political community, and finally 5) the fostering of
peace and the promotion of a community or nations.
Although everyone of these pastoral and moral challenges
remain singularly crucial today, even after almost 40
years, it is the final sad area of human life which
I lift up for reflection in this column.
The Second World War ended with the horrific unleashing
of nuclear energy upon the citizens of Hiroshima on
Aug. 6, 1945 (the Feast of the Transfiguration), and
on a similar group of innocent people in Nagasaki on
Aug. 9, 1965. As a pilgrim I have visited both sites
and stood mute at these places of such utter devastation
and suffering. No one can do so and remain unchanged.
Though debated over the years, the vast majority of
Catholic theologians have concluded that the use by
the United States of those nuclear bombs was morally
wrong, no matter what the intention may have been. The
end never justifies the means. In particular, these
thoughtful men and women pondered the moral tradition
of the church and pointed out the undifferentiated killing
of countless innocent non military combatants and the
fact that the act itself was a final demonstration of
power not needed to bring the conflict to an end.
During the past few days we have paused to commemorate
the 40th anniversary of those two events. As people
of faith we may not allow them to fade into a mere cloud
of patriotism. They remain challenges to American moral
integrity and probably reasons for national repentance.
The end never justifies the means.
Since then every part of the globe has known the horror
of wars and the pleas for peace on the part of innocent
children.
The Council fathers listed so many aspects of war as
it came to be experienced: its horror and perversity,
the multiplication of scientific weapons, the indiscriminate
destruction of populations, the almost total and reciprocal
slaughter of humanity, the widespread natural devastation
and its deadly aftereffects. They solemnly concluded
that “all these considerations compel us to undertake
an evaluation of war with an entirely new attitude”
(paragraph 80). This remains true for us as Catholics
and Christians, no matter what our political affiliations
may be.
Tragically our newspapers and television reports present
a daily reminder of the deadly nature of war, and in
particular the terror of the current war in Iraq for
military combatants, their families and innocent Iraqi
citizens alike. The lethal count of our military casualties
increases daily, and the heartache for families who
mourn the deaths of their most promising loved ones
can’t even begin to be calculated.
The very fact that Pentagon officials admit that they
do not keep count of Iraqi casualties suggests to many
observers that we cannot bear facing the full impact
of the human damage being caused.
This situation is further complicated by the noble purposes
of so many of the men and women who have been ripped
from their families and mobilized for that war effort
so far from home. I regularly pray at Eucharist for
all those who labor to achieve peace in the world and
for those who suffer so terribly because of its absence.
As Catholics we simply cannot allow ourselves to become
accustomed to the daily brutality of this war or any
other military conflict in our world today. Nor can
we allow ourselves to forget that the highest levels
of our universal Catholic Church concluded that the
decision of the United States to go to war in Iraq was
morally indefensible. That suggests that this war itself
is wrong. Since that time even greater moral clarity
on this question seems to have been provided by the
lack of sufficient cause, the unnecessary harm to innocent
people and preference for military rather than diplomatic
solutions.
Evil is real and terrorism is a dreadful reality in
our world. Virtually all religious traditions across
the globe, including our best Islamic leaders, are increasingly
distancing themselves from terrorism in any form. Personally,
I grow more and more convinced that any declaration
of “war” against that human pathology is
misguided when the best “instruments” for
its removal from the globe should rather be education
and economic development.
This is a time for the aims of the Second Vatican Council
to find fresh expression and better results. As Pope
John Paul II often stated, the best defense against
bad teaching is good teaching. At the beginning of a
new academic year our teachers, parents and catechists
must consider forging a different path for our children
and youth. The future of the world depends on it.
|