Sponsored by
Catholic Knights
Milwaukee Catholic Herald Subscribe to the Milwaukee Catholic Herald
Food for the Poor
Information about Milwaukee Catholic Herald Links Related to the Catholic Herald Catholic Herald Classifieds Catholic School/Parish Sports Listings Catholic School/Parish Sports Listings Catholic Herald Advertising
Milwaukee Catholic Herald Home Page
Herald of hope
National and World Catholic News Links
Past Catholic Herald Issues
Photos of the Week
Submit Information
St. Ann Center
Rosalie Manor
Capri Communities
June 24, 2004
Supreme Court rejects appeal
by Milwaukee Archdiocese
Decision involves former priest, Siegfried Widera
By Sam Lucero
Catholic Herald Staff
ST. FRANCIS — A U.S. Supreme Court decision not to block a California lawsuit against the Archdiocese of Milwaukee could lead to continued financial troubles for the archdiocese.

The Supreme Court June 21 rejected an appeal seeking dismissal of a sexual abuse lawsuit filed in California against the Milwaukee Archdiocese.

Attorneys for the archdiocese had sought reversal of lower court rulings on the case in California. They argued that a California court should not handle cases involving religious institutions in other states and the priest accused of the abuse was no longer connected to the Milwaukee Archdiocese when the abuse allegedly occurred.

The lawsuit involves the late Siegfried F. Widera, a former priest of the Milwaukee Archdiocese who moved to California in 1976 following a conviction for child molestation three years earlier. He became a priest of the Diocese of Orange, Calif., in 1981. He was removed from ministry there in 1985.

Widera jumped to his death from a hotel balcony in Mazatlan, Mexico, on May 25, 2003, as police sought him for extradition to the United States to face more than 40 charges of child molestation in Wisconsin and California. He had been on the run for more than a year.

Last September, a California appeals court ruled that the lawsuit against the archdiocese could proceed since Milwaukee church officials had failed to notify the bishop of Orange that the priest had a criminal record for child molestation.

The Supreme Court’s dismissal of the case simply answers a procedural question and did not address merits of the lawsuit, according to Dave Muth, an attorney at Quarles and Brady, one of the attorneys representing the archdiocese.

“This was a procedural question,” Muth told the Catholic Herald. “We are in position where it’s as if the lawsuit started right now. We are in a very preliminary stage. I know the parties are in mediation in California and we’re going to have to see what’s going on there.”

Jerry Topczewski, administrative assistant to Archbishop Timothy M. Dolan, said it was too soon to discuss financial implications of a lawsuit.

“The question for the court was one of jurisdiction, and the merits of the lawsuit have not yet been addressed,” he said in a statement. “Now we’ll get to work on resolving the issue at hand, on the merits of the case in the best interests of everyone involved.”

The California lawsuit, filed in 2002, alleges that Eric Paino was sexually assaulted by Widera in California in 1985 when Paino was 8 years old. According to Steve Rubino, who along with attorney Katherine Freberg of Irvine, Calif., is representing Paino, seven other victims currently have cases pending against the Orange Diocese.

“We have several cases in California against the Diocese of Orange relating to Siegfried Widera, and I’m sure we will be adding (the Milwaukee Archdiocese) into the lawsuit as quickly as we can,” he told the Catholic Herald.

Scott Idleman, associate professor at Marquette University’s School of Law, said that the Supreme Court decision does not weigh in on culpability. It simply rules on a jurisdictional question.

“The fact that the archdiocese can be sued in this court doesn’t tell you in and of itself the outcome of the case,” he said. “The archdiocese could still prevail as a defendant.

“What this means is the archdiocese is going to have to litigate now. It’s going to have to defend against the allegations themselves,” added Idleman. “It no longer can say that it doesn’t belong in that court. That issue is now settled.”

Sexual abuse settlement cases against dioceses across the country have led to serious financial troubles. Bishop Gerald F. Kicanas of Tucson, Ariz., announced last weekend that his diocese is considering filing Chapter 11 bankruptcy in the face of sexual abuse lawsuits seeking millions of dollars.

In April, the Boston Archdiocese announced the sale of 43 acres of archdiocesan land to pay off $90 million in loans taken out to pay off clergy sexual abuse settlements.

In Milwaukee, Archbishop Dolan announced the elimination of 23 jobs at the Cousins Center last month. The layoffs coincided with $1 million budget deficit for the 2003-2004 fiscal year, blamed partly on costs associated with the clergy sexual abuse scandal.

Catholic News Service contributed to this report.
Back to the top